Leaders
Dallmeier

Business Directory

Browse the Directory

Sign Up to the Directory

FC Business Twitter
FC business Linked in
FC Business facebook
FC Business Youtube

ECJ rules Football Fixture Lists Cannot Be Protected by Copyright

Thu 1st Mar 2012 | Legal

A football fixture list cannot be protected by copyright when its compilation is dictated by rules or constraints which leave no room for creative freedom

The Database Directive1 grants copyright protection to databases if the selection or arrangement of their contents constitute the author’s own intellectual creation. The databases can also be eligible for protection by a so-called ‘sui generis’ right when the obtention, verification or presentation of their contents required a substantial investment.

In the main proceedings, the UK company Football Dataco, which is responsible for protecting the rights acquired in the English and Scottish football league fixtures, and the organisers of those leagues accuse Yahoo! UK, Stan James (a bookmaker) and Enetpulse (a sports information provider) of having infringed their intellectual property rights in the football fixture lists by having used those fixture lists without paying financial compensation.

The fixture lists are prepared in accordance with several ‘golden rules’. The process of preparing is in part automated but requires, however, very significant labour and skill in order to satisfy the multitude of requirements of the parties concerned whilst respecting the rules.

The national court has already rejected a ‘sui generis’ protection of those fixture lists in accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice2. By contrast, it raises the question of the possibility of those lists being eligible for copyright protection. In that context, it asks the Court of Justice to clarify the conditions which must be satisfied in order to be eligible for that protection.

The Court states, first, that the copyright protection provided for by the Database Directive concerns the ‘structure’ of the database, and not its ‘contents’. That protection does not extend to the data itself. In that context, the concepts of ‘selection’ and of ‘arrangement’ within the meaning of the directive refer respectively to the selection and the arrangement of data, through which the author gives the database its structure. By contrast, those concepts do not extend to the creation of the data contained in that database. Consequently, the intellectual effort and skill of creating data are not relevant in order to assess the eligibility of the database that contains them for the copyright protection provided for by the directive.

In the present case, the effort and skill of creating the lists relate to the creation of the same data contained in the base. As a consequence, that effort and skill are, in any event, of no relevance in order to assess the eligibility of the football fixture lists concerned for the copyright protection provided for by the directive.

The Court then observes that the notion of ‘intellectual creation’, which is a necessary condition in order to be eligible for copyright protection, refers to the sole criterion of originality. As regards the setting up of a database, that criterion of originality is satisfied when, through the selection or arrangement of the data which it contains, its author expresses his creative ability in an original manner by making free and creative choices. By contrast, that criterion is not satisfied when the setting up of the database is dictated by technical considerations, rules or constraints which leave no room for creative freedom.

The ‘addition of important significance’ to the data by their selection or arrangement in the database does not affect the determination of the originality required for that database to be protected by copyright.

Similarly, the fact that the setting up of the database required, irrespective of the creation of the data which it contains, significant labour and skill on the part of its author does not justify, as such, the protection of it by copyright if that labour and that skill do not express any originality in the selection or arrangement of that data.

It is for the national court to assess, in the light of the considerations set out by the Court, whether the football fixture lists concerned are databases which satisfy the conditions of eligibility for copyright protection. However, the Court adds that unless the procedures for creating the lists concerned as described by the national court are supplemented by elements reflecting originality in the selection or arrangement of the data contained in those lists, they do not suffice for those lists to be protected by the copyright laid down in the directive.

Finally, the Court states that, given that the directive harmonises the protection given by copyright to databases, national legislation which grants copyright protection under conditions which are different to those set out in the directive is incompatible with European Union law.

 Posted by: Aaron Gourley

http://www.buttonshut.com http://www.buttonshut.com http://www.buttonshut.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RETURN TO LATEST NEWS SECTION

SUBSCRIBE TO THE FCBUSINESS RSS FEED

If you have any football business related news stories you’d like to share then please contact us – agourley@fcbusiness.co.uk or ryan@fcbusiness.co.uk

Add to: Google Google | Yahoo Yahoo | Live Live | del.icio.us del.icio | Digg Digg |

Related Articles

Supreme Court Rules Against Rangers in 'Big Tax Case'

Wed 5th Jul 2017 | Legal

The Supreme Court has ruled in favour of HMRC over Rangers’ use of Employee Benefit Trusts (EBTs) between 2001 and 2010. In its judgement over the use of EBTs, the Supreme Court upheld...

Legal Comment: Football’s Deep Filled Problem With Gambling

Fri 24th Feb 2017 | Legal

On 20 February 2016, the FA Cup fixture between Sutton United and Arsenal turned into a media frenzy and one to remember, for all the wrong reasons. Laura McCallum, solicitor at Harper Macleod...

Manchester City Charged Over Anti-Doping Rule Breaches

Thu 12th Jan 2017 | Legal

The Football Association (The FA) have charged Manchester City for failing to ensure anti-doping officials knew where players were for drugs testing. Manchester City have been charged for failing to...

Hitchin Town Player Sacked For Abusive Tweets

Wed 4th Jan 2017 | Legal

Alfie Barker has been sacked by Hitchin Town and is under investigation by the Football Association after vile messages from his Twitter account were sent to AFC Bournemouth and Republic of Ireland...