Academics Question Fairness of FIFA World Cup Qualification
Wed 11th Jun 2014 | FIFA
On the eve of the World Cup in Brazil, two academics have called into question the fairness of the qualification system of the world’s most glamorous and lucrative sporting tournament.
208 member football associations from around the world clamour to qualify for each World Cup tournament and reap the massive $8 million appearance fee as well as further windfalls and lucrative merchandising revenues.
But with fierce competition for qualification, is FIFA allocating the 32 places fairly or are processes biased by finances and politics?
New research, published in the journal Soccer & Society, suggests that a more transparent allocation processes is urgently required. Without this, experts at Canada’s Sprott School of Business argue, FIFA will be open to the accusation it is more concerned with financial gain from the World Cup than showcasing the very best football.
The allocation of World Cup qualification spots is dictated by FIFA between six confederations of member countries. Each confederation has a set number of places according to how ‘strong’ they are and their level of performance in the previous 4 years.
2010 saw $40 million paid to 400 clubs from 55 FIFA Member countries. The lion’s share of revenue goes to a small proportion of FIFA members, primarily top European clubs. The CONMEBOL and UEFA regions, less than 20% of total FIFA membership (but including Brazil, Argentina, Italy, Spain, Germany, France, England and the Netherlands) holds more than half the qualifying spots. Is the World Cup a self-fuelling competition for the elite?
In their new article, “Unfair play in World Cup qualification? An analysis of the 1998–2010 FIFA World Cup performances and the bias in the allocation of tournament berths”, Christian Stone and Michel Rod studied the match results for 1st round tournament matches 1998-2010 to assess the adequacy of the qualification process.
This demonstrated that the current system of qualification is not based on ensuring the qualification of the best 32 teams in the world, nor does it fairly allocate qualification spots on the number of teams per federation or any other metric.
Such findings suggest things could be done differently and identify the need for a more dynamic system with fewer fixed spots and more opportunity for inter-confederation play, giving those at the top of their game the opportunity to shine and for a truer representation of the best during the World Cup.
The World Cup generates 90% of FIFA revenues. Stone and Rod believe that this economic success should be used by FIFA, in the cause of corporate social responsibility, to expand participation. Without that, the question is asked “has world football become the means to an end in terms of money as the ultimate objective?”
Soccer & Society, Christian Stone & Michel Rod, published by Taylor & Francis
* Read the full article online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14660970.2014.891985
Follow on Twitter @tandfnewsroom
Image: Action Images / John Sibley Livepic
Posted by: Aaron Gourley
|RETURN TO LATEST NEWS SECTION|
|SUBSCRIBE TO THE FCBUSINESS RSS FEED|
|If you have any football business related news stories you’d like to share then please contact us –|
To subscribe to our range of football newsletters including news, products and jobs CLICK HERE.
Thu 24th Nov 2016 | FIFA
From 2013 to date, English clubs had the most transfers involving engaging club intermediaries - 905, representing 37.7% of all incoming transfers to England. The report compiled by FIFA Transfer...
Thu 13th Oct 2016 | FIFA
A passionate advocate of equality and inclusion in sports, Joyce Cook will take up the role of FIFA Chief Member Associations Officer on 1 November 2016. This position was created as part of the...
Fri 23rd Sep 2016 | FIFA
Former Dutch football international Marco van Basten has been appointed as FIFA Chief Officer for Technical Development. The role, which he officially starts next week, will see van Basten head up all...