Business Directory

Browse the Directory

Sign Up to the Directory

FC Business Twitter
FC business Linked in
FC Business facebook
FC Business Youtube

Massimo Cellino Loses Football League Appeal

Mon 19th Jan 2015 | Clubs Ownership

Leeds United owner, Massimo Cellino, has lost his appeal against the Football League’s decision to disqualify him under the Owners’ and Directors’ Test.

Cellino, who took over at Leeds in April 2014, was disqualified by the Football League in December 2014 for an act involving dishonesty after he was found guilty of an offence under Italian tax legislation relating to the non-payment of import duties on a boat. 

A Professional Conduct Committee (PCC) chaired by Tim Kerr QC rejected his appeal against the decision by the Board of The Football League. 

The PCC found that the reasoned judgment of the Italian Court, once it had become available, was for an act involving dishonesty as determined by the Board in its original ruling in March 2014.  
Mr. Cellino’s appeal against that original decision had been upheld on the basis that it could not be concluded that the offence necessarily involved a ‘Dishonest Act’ for the purposes of the Test. 

Once the reasoned judgment became available, the Board considered the matter again and concluded that it clearly demonstrated that Mr. Cellino’s offence did indeed involve acts that would reasonably be considered to be dishonest. 
In its judgment, dismissing Mr Cellino’s appeal against the decision, the PCC states, “We consider that the judge’s findings of fact and her description of Mr.  Cellino’s state of mind based on them, is of conduct which would reasonably be considered to be dishonest. 

“We therefore conclude that Mr.Cellino has been convicted of an offence involving a ‘Dishonest Act’ within the meaning of the rules, and that he is accordingly subject to a ‘Disqualifying Condition’. 
As a result of this decision, Massimo Cellino is disqualified from acting as a ‘Relevant Person’, as defined by Football League regulations until 10th April 2015. 

The Football League will provide any assistance requested by Leeds United to help it minimise, as far as possible, the effect this decision has on the Club while Mr. Cellino serves his period of disqualification. 
A Football League spokesman said, "The Football League's sole objective throughout this process has been to ensure that our regulations, as democratically approved by our member clubs, are complied with. 

“These regulations uphold principles relating to club ownership that are widely recognised to be in the interests of the game and have the support of the other football authorities, the Government and football supporters generally.” 
In response to the decision, Leeds United released the following statement, “Mr Cellino would like to thank the fans, sponsors and members of the wider footballing community that have given him overwhelming support, not just since the disqualifying order was issued but since he arrived at the club.

“We are surprised and disappointed by the verdict, however we are continuing to take legal advice.

“We will release further statements in due course.”

Commenting on the PCC's decision, Thomas Barnard, sports specialist solicitor at leading law firm Thomas Eggar LLP, said, “Even though the ban is relatively short, the need for Mr Cellino to cut ties with the Club and to refrain from acting as a “Relevant Person” is likely to cause Leeds real difficulties.  

"The Rules provide that Mr Cellino will not only have to refrain from decision making at the Club, but possibly sell or transfer his shareholding such that he is unable to exercise any control over the Club.  If he doesn’t take steps to ensure that he is unable to exercise control of the Club, then Mr Cellino and Leeds would potentially be subject to further sanctions.

“The League’s decision highlights the importance to clubs of having contingency plans in place to deal with such disqualifications.  In this case Leeds FC, who has known of the possibility of the ban for some time, is likely to defer critical decisions to other senior managers at the Club.  Legally, it will be more difficult to deal with Mr Cellino’s shares in the club and his legal entitlement to exercise control over its affairs.

“The League also refused Mr Cellino’s review application, meaning that there is no right for Mr Cellino to challenge the length of the ban imposed.  It therefore seems unlikely, given the League’s reasoning for the decision, that Mr Cellino will exercise any further right to appeal.”

Posted by: Aaron Gourley 




If you have any football business related news stories you’d like to share then please contact us – agourley@fcbusiness.co.uk  

To subscribe to our range of football newsletters including news, products and jobs CLICK HERE.

Add to: Google Google | Yahoo Yahoo | Live Live | del.icio.us del.icio | Digg Digg |

Related Articles

EFL To Consider US Style Interventions At Troubled Clubs

Thu 21st Sep 2017 | Clubs Ownership

Giving the EFL unprecedented American-style powers to take over the running of clubs in crisis will be on the agenda when clubs meet today to discuss how the situation which ravaged Leyton Orient can...

Ossett Albion Takeover Brings Readymade Academy

Wed 13th Sep 2017 | Clubs Ownership

The founders and directors of Unita, a local based facilities management company, have taken the reigns at Ossett Albion in a move which sees the EVO-Stik North club inherit a ready-made football...

Southampton Secures Chinese Investment Partners

Mon 14th Aug 2017 | Clubs Ownership

Southampton Football Club has announced the formal conclusion of talks which will see Chinese businessman Mr Jisheng Gao take a stake in the Premier League club. In a letter to fans issued on Monday...

Altrincham FC Seek New Investment

Thu 13th Jul 2017 | Clubs Ownership

At a recent Extraordinary General Meeting, the shareholders of Altrincham Football Club passed a series of motions which will now allow the club to bring in new investors. A new controlling share in...